MCP is live: Net Zero Insights data, now in your AI tools

  Climate Tech

What is Climate Tech?

  Definition

Climate Tech is the set of technologies rebuilding how the world makes energy, materials, food and movement. It is a response to the climate crisis, and it is also one of the largest economic opportunities of this century.

It is not a niche sector. It is a rebuild of the systems the whole economy runs on: how power is generated, how steel and cement are made, how goods move, how food is grown. That rebuild is where the opportunity sits.

40% of the cumulative emissions reductions required rely on technologies that have not yet been commercially deployed in mass-market applications, according to a report by IEA. Each of those technologies is a market without an established incumbent. The companies that industrialise them first will define the industries that replace today’s.

  Context

What Climate Tech responds to

The climate crisis is not one problem with one fix. It shows up as extreme weather, rising seas, failing harvests, collapsing habitats and degraded land, and each of those pressures lands on a different part of the economy.

That is why Climate Tech spans so many sectors at once. Tackling it demands a systemic transformation across nearly every industry and value chain, which is exactly what makes the market hard to see whole.

  • Food & Water Insecurity
  • Extreme Weather
  • Rising Sea Levels
Climate
Crisis
  • Natural Disasters
  • Biodiversity Collapse
  • Environmental Degradation

Framework

The EU Taxonomy

Defining Climate Tech can be tricky, but the EU Taxonomy gives it a foundation. It is the European Union’s framework for classifying which economic activities count as environmentally sustainable, and it sets out six environmental objectives.

An activity qualifies by contributing substantially to at least one of those objectives without doing significant harm to the others. Read against that framework, Climate Tech is the set of innovative products, services and technologies built to advance them.

Activities that substantially cut or avoid greenhouse gas emissions, or increase permanent removals, in line with holding warming to 1.5°C.

Climate change mitigation

Activities that reduce the adverse effects of today’s and future climate, or the risk of them, without shifting that risk onto others.

Climate change adaptation

Activities that prevent or reduce pollutants entering air, water or land, including better handling of chemicals, waste and industrial emissions.

Pollution prevention and control

Activities that keep materials in use for longer through efficient resource use, durability, reuse, repair and recycling, and that cut waste.

Transition to a circular economy

Activities that conserve or restore habitats and species, and support sustainable land, agricultural and forestry management.

Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems

Activities that protect the good status of water bodies and marine waters, or prevent deterioration, through better water use and less pollution.

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources

Classification

The Climate Tech Taxonomy

At Net Zero Insights we classify Climate Tech by the challenge a solution addresses, not by the industry label a company happens to sit under. Challenge areas cut across value chains, which is how a hydrogen electrolyser, a cement kiln retrofit and a grid balancing platform can be compared on the same terms.

The map below sets out the ten challenge areas, and every one of them resolves into far more specific layers underneath. What you see here is the top of that structure, not the whole of it.

Built Environment
Building Energy Efficiency
Smart City
Construction
Water Conservation in Buildings
Circular Economy
Waste Management
Circular Marketplace
Circular Packaging
Food Waste and Loss
Shared Mobility
IT Asset Disposition (ITAD)
Emissions Control & Offsetting
Emissions Monitoring
Carbon Verification
Emissions Accounting and Compliance
Carbon Markets and Offsets
Energy
Energy Generation
Energy Storage
Grid
Energy Efficiency and Management
Food & Agriculture
Agriculture
Food and Beverage
GHG Capture, Removal & Storage
Direct Air Capture
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)
Enhanced Weathering
Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement
Soil Carbon Sequestration
Biochar
Industry
Ammonia Production
Cement and Concrete
Iron and Steel
Materials
Specialty Chemicals
Extraction and Mining
Natural Environment
Climate Monitoring
Afforestation & Reforestation (AR)
Biodiversity
Climate Risk and Environmental Disaster Management
Water Conservation in Natural Environment
Water
Water Treatment
Water Conservation and Efficiency
Water Distribution
Transport
Electric Vehicle (EV)
Charging Stations
Shared Mobility
Transport Fuels
Fuel Efficiency
Hydrogen Technologies for Transport
Transport Logistics
Ports and Maritime Transport

How far the taxonomy goes

The challenge areas above are the top layer. Underneath, every area resolves into solutions, technologies and specific sub-technologies. One path through hydrogen:

  1. ChallengeEnergyThe top layer. Ten challenge areas covering every part of the economy that has to change.
  2. SolutionHydrogenWhat the technology sets out to do, independent of how it is built.
  3. TechnologyElectrolysisThe specific method. Steam methane reforming, autothermal reforming and coal gasification sit alongside it.
  4. Sub-technologySolid Oxide Electrolyser Cell (SOEC)Where the taxonomy ends up. Also PEM, alkaline and anion exchange membrane cells, each tracked separately.

This structure is the backbone of the Net0 Platform: every company, deal and infrastructure project we track is classified against it. It is not a fixed list. Each time our research team takes on a new topic, the taxonomy gains another layer of depth, so the map keeps pace with the market rather than describing where it used to be.

Datasets

What the taxonomy powers

The taxonomy is only useful because things are attached to it. Every company, investor, fund, deal, agreement and project we track is classified against the same structure, which is what lets a hydrogen electrolyser and a cement retrofit be compared on the same terms.

The value is not the lists. It is the activity between them: who funded whom, who committed capital to which fund, who signed an offtake with whom, and which projects those agreements sit against.

Private capitalGrants & public fundingDebt & project financeCommercial activity
Capital ownersIntermediariesThe marketWhere it lands
Limited PartnersPension funds, SWFs, corporates, family offices
CorporatesIncumbents that can be LPs, investors and buyers
GovernmentsPublic programmes, agencies and national funds
Banks & LendersCommercial banks, development banks, project lenders
FundsBy vintage, target size and strategy
InvestorsVC, PE and growth firms deploying capital
CompaniesPrivate companies from pre-seed to exit, classified by the taxonomy
Commercial AgreementsOfftake, supply and partnership
Infrastructure ProjectsPlants and facilities being built
as LPEquity dealsCorporate ventureGrantsDebtsignbuildOfftake & supplyattached toPublic fundingProject finance
  1. Limited Partners, corporates among them, commit capital to Funds
  2. Funds and Investors deploy it into Companies through equity Deals
  3. Corporates also invest directly, through corporate venture
  4. Governments add grants to companies, and back Infrastructure Projects directly
  5. Banks and lenders provide debt, and finance Infrastructure Projects
  6. Companies sign Commercial Agreements and build Infrastructure Projects, and those agreements attach to the projects
  7. Those same corporates turn up once more as the buyers in offtake and supply deals
Private capital Grants & public funding Debt & project finance Commercial activity Relationships

Every entity and every connection in this model is searchable, filterable and exportable in the platform.